In Lightroom you have to select the folder and start a sync process for adding an image typically an HDR or panorama image rendered by another tool to the catalog. Adding an image to such a folder the image will show in the cataloged files without the need for a manual sync like in Lightroom Classic. In addition both programs sync the content of a already imported folder automatically. This is a function which comes in very handy in some situations. Just like shown in the video both ON1 Photo RAW and Luminar can edit edit an image without the need for a formal import process like in Lightroom. But maybe it is possible to tag the images with GeoSetter or other tools. At least in ON1 Photo RAW there is button besides the GPS data which opens Google Maps in your favorite browser.īut Lightroom can also tag selected images by using a GPS track file, a function which is missing in ON1 Photo RAW so far. This not only displays the position of the selected image but also the locations of all images captured nearby. And Lightroom is the only program in this comparism which offers a seperate map modul. If you collect GPS data by an external logger like the Holux M-241 or if your camera has a modul to log GPS data only Lightroom and ON1 Photo RAW display this data as part of the image meta data.
But smart collection can be dfined only in ON1 Photo RAW and Lightroom. But essential is the option for smart-collections where an image is automatically added to one or more collections by applying certain keywords or a co,bination of the Exif metadata. Manual collections where the images are manually selected by the user and added to the collection or an album are implmented in all 3 programs. Album/CollectionsĪ good image mangement allow the user to add certain images to an album or an collection, like for the last vacation or other hilights. Another difference is there bteween Lightroom and ON1 Photo Raw, Lightroom implmented a hierarchical keyword list. At this time this is the main handicap besides the missing filter option by any sort of Exif metatdata in Luminar 3. According to the published roadmap this is supposed to be implemented by mid of the year. Lightroom Classic offers adding keywords to your images just like ON1 Photo RAW.īut so far we must realize that Luminar 3 isn’t capable of adding keywords zto your images. A filter according to the capture dates is done very much comparable to IMatch, where the program defines such filters automatically. So it is not possible to filter the displayed set of images on the used camera or used lens for example. While both Lightroom and On1 Photo RAW deliver a complete set of the Exif-metadata you can see the basic data in Luminar 3, but Luminar 3 so far cannot filter by any of these parameters. I did a little video which shows the differences in the 3 programs:Įven in the basic Exif-data there is a difference:
Basically this is right but in the subscription model like in Adobe’s Photography plan you also have Photoshop CC which of course is able to handle layers. But anyway i want to modify one main issue because for both ON1 Photo RAW and Luminar most of the comparism state out the both programs can do layers and Lightroom not. This post is not about the image processing capabilites but to list the main differences in the catalog functions. Anyway we now have 3 image processing tools with catalog functionality and both Luminar 3 and ON1 Photo RAW 2019 regard themselve to be compeitots to Lightroom. But they already promised to do an error correction version by the end of this month. But we must state that the implmentation was poorly done and version 3 has a couple of other bugs, so Skylum did get a lot of stick for this version. Luminar 3 fullfilled their promise with version 3 and added library support to their raw processing tool. Therfor this blog post will compare the different catalog functions. Luminar 3 and their library function caused a lot of fuss at the end of the last year.
0 kommentar(er)
